Dramatic Portrait Contest

We have a winner. I have selected a picture by T.J.Asher as the winner of the dramatic portrait contest.

2008-12-14-IMG_0157.jpg

T.J. will get the ticket to go see David Ziser. Congratulations T.J.

I thought I would pick a couple of runners up, so that they could hit their desk, and say “Shoot, I almost won!”

Here are a couple pictures from Rich Yates, and Jorge Rimblas

Sam4

Sarah

Thanks everyone for entering. Who knows, maybe I will do this again sometime.

Lighting Friday

I have a whole bunch of lighting related stuff to mention today:

starving student kit sx1I got my starving student kit (SX2) from Midwest Photo Exchange. This is a pretty neat kit. If you check out the link you will see all the stuff that is included. The highlights are the stand (fairly compact), a shoot through umbrella, a swivel that connects the stand, the umbrella, the flash, and allows the flash/umbrella to tilt. The umbrella is really compact when folded.

I decided to get the kit to get all the pieces to try it out. They are supportive of the strobist community, and the kit gets a discount. There is some other stuff in the kit that will be fun to play with too. Gells, tape, straws and cinefoil to use to make DIY light shaping tools.

Mpex also has a new all manual flash, the LumoPro LP120  for only $129 that I might look at later.

Photoflex Lightdome

Well, I decided that the umbrella wasn’t enough, I needed to spring for a softbox. We had been using them in the studio lighting class exclusively, and this small LightDome that works on my SB800 was on sale. I head of this gem from Matt Brandon. He¬†posted about¬†using one here and then PhotoFlex was highlighting him.

What makes this kind of funny is that tomorrow I am going to go take pictures of a newborn with this very contraption. Just so happens that friends down the street just had their second baby, and I just happened to get a light box. Coincidence?

This is not the same item, but I will try the same ideas as this strobist post too soon.

Vector

I am also finally going to get to use my new light toy. Well, those other things are really my newest light toys, but at one time this was, and I haven’t used it yet. I need to make sure it is changed up. Heading out with some friends to hit a barn with 2 million¬†watts of light. Actually, 8 million watts of light if we all hit the barn with the lights. Might even be too much light! Anyway, that should be fun.

So, lots of new toys, and I am going to try to use them all this weekend. Everyone always says you shouldn’t buy new shoes the day before the big race, and I probably shouldn’t head to take portraits with¬†new equipment¬†I have never tried before, but hey, what the heck. Pictures to follow.

Organization in Aperture 2

aperture

There is a post on the Pixelatedimage about organization in Lightroom, and I thought hey! I could do one about using Aperture. Truth be told, they have some similar concepts.

  1. Referenced, or library? I don’t keep all my images in the library. I like to keep them in a file structure on my hard drive. I do this for¬†three¬† reasons. First is for backup. I like to be able to backup my images with simple tools. I run an rsync script to my backup server. (more about backups later)¬†This also allows me to access the raw files directly from Adobe Bridge if I so choose instead of creating an “edit” copy for Photoshop from within Aperture. I like to be able to use Camera Raw on the raw files sometimes. Third, my library file isn’t HUGE. It still get’s plenty big. All the meta data, versions, and edits go into the library. Also, the files aren’t on my machine. I use an external drive to store the masters. More in the backup section.
  2. File Structure. I have created a structure on my hard drive that works for me. Actually, I have redone this a few times. I even started with the files in a library before changing my mind. Aperture will let you move files around with amazing aplumb. So, I have a “Aperture Masters” folder that I then have folders for different years in it, eg 2007, 2008, 2009. Then within this I choose to break it up into family, photography, work. I did it this way partly to make it easier for my family to get to and find the family pictures if they need to, on my computer, or on the backup server. The split of photography and work may not make sense to you. I don’t get much “work”, but I wanted to make it easy to distinguish me out shooting water falls from a client’s photo shoot. I could use tags or colors. I choose folders. To each their own. I may change my mind. Note: you have to actually make these folders in aperture, it wont mirror the file system.
  3. The import process. I usually have enough cards that I wait until I get them to my computer to upload the pictures. Before I upload the pictures, I create a new project. I usually name it something like “Apr 7 – night shots”. It would probably be better to use numbers on the projects so that May sorts before Dec, but I have been doing it this way anyway. I like the having the date and a very shot description to the project. This¬†will also be the name of the folder under the year¬†folder. Next is to make¬†sure that Aperture puts the pictures where you think they are going. On the right of the import screen there is a¬†place to choose library vs referenced, and if you pick referenced, you pick the file location. This highlights¬†a drawback to my system. I have to switch the path every time I switch an import session between family and photography. Yes I have forgotten¬†once or twice. A big pain. You can also select an import preset. I have one created that sticks in my city, my name and copyright as tags with every picture. I wish I had more to say on this. I obviously don’t quite get it, because I spelled my name wrong on the preset and can’t change it! If anyone knows how to manage these, please blog about it and point me to it. Thanks.
  4. Ratings. I rate before keywording.¬†I do a fairly quick pass through with the browser window open at the bottom, and the view window above. I use the number keys to rate the pictures. Aperture supports marking as rejects (9) or 1-5. I don’t really use 1 and 2. First time through I mark stuff as rejects (out of focus, etc), nothing, or 3’s. The 3’s are ones I am pretty sure are some sort of keepers. Now I can filter the browser to only show “*** and above”, or images rated 3 or higher.¬†I then switch to full screen mode. Now I only have one big image in the view window with nothing hiding the image. I then go through all the images and pick ones to promote to 4’s and 5’s. David only has 5’s, why do I have 3, 4, and 5? Partly because he shoots more 5’s than me. I will still keep 3’s that are family pictures, or include some 4’s in flickr. 5’s are ones that I might want in my portfolio at some point.
  5. Keywording. I only keyword my 3 and up rated images. I try to give them location tags too. Not exif data, but I have a hierarchy of location tags that include city names, and then parks or landmarks under them where the picture was taken, or what it was of. For family shots, I have tags for each member of the extended family. I often fail to tag with them, but it is great later on when I get asked if I have any pictures of Alex to go on the yearly family calender my wife is making.
  6. Tweaking. This is the adjustments part of the exercise. I am shooting raw, so the¬†things that I tend to do are white balance, exposure, levels adjustments, increase blacks, and sometimes some vibrance.¬†Saturation tends to go straight for the over the top bin. A little vibrance boost can be nice. I probably do a little more than I should here. I am getting better at nailing my exposure, but I often just use the D90 auto white balance, and it often needs tweaking. Sometimes I will create a new version to try something different. Maybe make a B/W image, or a different crop. These are not copies, just versions of the original that Aperture applies it’s raw recipie to, so they take very little space. Sometimes I am not happy with what I can do in Aperture and I send the file to Photoshop with the open in external editor command.
  7. Folders and Smart Folders. These are special¬†folders (both) that don’t really exist. They are just for orginization in Aperture. I will make special folders to agregate projects, or for just part of a project. It really doesn’t matter how many you make, copies of your images are not created. Just links. I have done with with vacations, or to group different trips to the same landmark. I love smart folders. I have one of 4+ of my kids for example. In Aperture you can create a smart folder just as if you were searching your entire collection, then save it. So I say that I want all images for the year 2008 that are 4+ with keywords Lily or Kate. Sweet. I also do this for flowers and my favorite images. One cool thing is that these smart albums are available to the OS and the iLife apps as if they were just a folder. When I sync my iPhone, I select the smart folders I created like Kate and Lily 2008, and Portraits, and Portfolio, and then they get synced. Sweet. No messing around picking what to take. Every sync they get updated with the latest images.
  8. Uploading. Next comes uploading to various places. If I have family pictures I use the Gallery plugin to send my images to my family website at annieandchris.net. If I have other interesting images, I will send them to my flickr account. First I change the browser filter to 3+, or 4+, then select the images, right click and pick my export plugin. The flickr pictures I first send to BorderFX. This allows me to add a border (funny about that) and put my name in the lower right corner. I export these to a temp folder. I then use FlickrUploader. Why don’t I use the plugin to send directly to flickr? I like to add my name to the images, and recently I have been adding borders to most of the pictures too. It does add an extra step though. I then delete the exported images from the temp folder. If I am planning on printing some images, I use the export versions command. I don’t have a good home printer, so I usually use whcc, or sometimes family pics at shutterfly and pick them up at Target.¬†¬†I export the images as jpegs at full size to a temp folder again, then use the ROES software with whcc. After they are sent, I delete the temp images.
  9. Clean up. This is more a step that I say that I am going to do, more than I do. I do delete all the temp pictures that I create when exporting, but do I really need to keep a bunch of not really good enough pictures. What should I do with the 1’s and 2’s that I didn’t rate. Why am I keeping them? Good question. Chicken I guess. Every once in a while I reject more than usual. But I often end of keeping them. If you don’t want to back up your rejects, you should actually delete them too.
  10. Backup. I don’t have a drobo. Scott Kelby just bought a new one (well, two) maybe I can dumpster dive for the old ones. What I have instead is a home built NAS. Well, actually I have a partial NAS. I am still rebuilding it. You can follow along (and build your own here, hope to have more soon). So the first thing I do, is from my mac, at the command line, I kick it old school (did I just write that?) and do a rsync command. This copies all changes (new files) from my iMac to my NAS. I just realized, I blogged about my backup strategy here last May. I am actually storing all my images on an external drive. I also use rsync to create a mirror to another identical removable drive that I periodically bring home, sync, then store off site. Then there is the library. It contains all the meta data and edits. I use the Aperture vault system and store the vaults on both my backup drives.

Well, thats my system. Or at least my plan. I will be one of the first to admit that I can get in a hurry and not keyword. I have shooting days from earlier this year that I haven’t even rated. My NAS is actually non functional right now (soon I tell ya, soon!!!), and I have had the “off site” drive sitting beside me for a couple of weeks. Sigh. Maybe it is more of a wish…

Photography Video Podcasts

I am a little bleary eyed at the moment. I was taking some time to catch up on some video podcasts. Which ones? Glad you asked.

First up would be Photoshop User TV. I thought there was a new one, but I had watched it on my laptop. I think they are often released on Tuesdays. Scott, Matt, and Dave and often special guests natter on about mostly photography related things and throw in several photoshop tutorials each week. If you like any of Scott Kelby’s books, you will like this.

Scott, Matt and Nikon have a new podcast up at DTownTV. This is mostly pretty basic stuff, but I have still learned a couple of things. They are doing a short series on wireless lighting using CLS right now. I am trying to absorb any and all things light at the moment.

I watched several of the Aperture 2: Quick Tips via iTunes by Rich Harrington. He has other stuff on his website, but you can search iTunes for Aperture to find them. I was going through a bunch of stuff he posted in 2008 on using Aperture 2. Anyone know how to edit an import preset? Mine is stuck with my name spelled wrong, and it is driving me crazy!

Ok, I didn’t hit these sites today, but I also watch video at a couple of other sites by the Davids: Strobist, and DigitalProTalk.

The Strobist has lots of great tutorials on setting up and using small flashes. Several series in fact. I started watching them before I even had a flash. I need to get back and see these again. And again.

At DigitalProTalk David has several videos up. He doesn’t do them every week (I don’t think) but the ones he has done have been great. They are usually about lighting and portraits and or weddings. Look at the right side of his blog, and you can see links to his most popular ones.

Are you a PCITW or a TCOOTW shooter?

I hate all the silly acronym’s that the computer industry comes up with. It feels like people try hard to be the first to make thier acronym for some new process or technique stick. I don’t try to hard to remember them. Luckily photographers don’t have so many.

On the other hand, I am trying to figure out good prounciations for PCITW and TCOOTW. What the heck is that you say? You are probably doing alread. David duChemin posts about his new photography acronym’s here. Put Crap In The Way, and Take Crap Out Of The Way. (t.coot.wa maybe?)

I find the PCITW very interresting. I don’t do really do that on purpose. I usually try to clean up my compositions, and Zack Aries has been getting on people about haveing crap in their pictures too (in some of the critiques). Mostly the issue is when the crap is in focus. That is not what David is talking about. It is about using a (usually) out of focus element to help frame and provide depth for the photo. I like this idea. I hope I can remember to try it (on purpose).

So you want a Critique by Zack Arias eh?

The eh? is my Canadian showing through. Zack Arias has been doing some critiques of people pictures and web sites since March 10. Here is the link to the first one. He has 8 of them as of this morning, I have seen 4 so far. They are really worth the time to watch.

Theses are really amazing on so many levels. First of all is how well he can do a critique in 5-7 minutes of someones work. Now granted, it looks like he spends some time before hand looking at a site before doing the video. Zack has a good eye for photographs, and a good understanding of web presence.

I have been taking notes as I watch. Some of the most useful information in the first few episodes has to do with how you present your work, more specificly how you present it on your web site. Some of the things that come up over and over are:

  • Show me who you are. Only post pictures of the type that show the type of photographer you are and the type of work you want.
  • Only post one version of a given picture (not color and B/W)
  • Only post a picture of any given model once. Pick the best one.
  • Don’t use the same building, boat, object more than once.
  • Only use your BEST work. Your best work will not pull up your weaker stuff, your weaker stuff will pull down your best work.

One of the biggest take aways so far is going to be the most difficult for me. This is the “show me who you are” part. I have a hard time with that. I really like shooting my kids – no money in that,¬† landscapes – you have to be really good at that (and travel), flowers – how do you sell that, and portraits – I have just started. So, if I want to take pictures of people, seniors, weddings, engagements, etc, I need to have a site focused on that, but I don’t have many pictures like that yet. I’ve got to put in the work. Funny about that eh? Until my pictures of people are better than my pictures of flowers, I am not going to have a great website to show people my “work”.

I have some lighting stuff coming. I need to be more agressive about getting oportunities to take peoples pictures to both get better at it, and to build my portfolio.

To switch gears, I feel bad for some of the people. The girl that shot the wedding with her camera on auto, direct on camera flash, crooked pictures and poor cropping made me cringe. I sure hope my first wedding doesn’t go like that. He also has people submitting their flickr account with ony pictures of their kids on it and asking what they need to do to make money at this. Yeesh.

I feel that my pictures are squarely in the middle of what he has seen. I don’t take as good of pictures as the ones he has praised, but I sure don’t take as bad of pictures as the ones he trashes. My web site on the other hand would be trashed. I really need to work on my web presence.

The other think that is interresting is that I don’t always agree with him on the shots that he thinks are amazing. I almost always agree with his “chuck” pile, but some of the pictures he like I find my self scratching my head. One thing that appears to be a trend is to shots that are very close to blown out. There are lots of pictures that look overexposed to me that he thinks have great lighting. I am new to the whole being critical of photography/art thing, and I suppose that we might just have different tastes.

It would be interresting to get a critique of my photo’s. He already has a billion submissions, and my I need to work on my site before I would want to have that part looked at.

I really need to look at where I am going as a photographer. Where are you going?

More Pictures of Sam

I have a few more pictures of Sam. Thanks Sam for coming to our shoot. You were great to work with.

I really like this shot in the elevator with the alien bees ring light. I would love to have one. Anyone want to gift one my way?

Sam3

I have a few others that were from the studio. These turned out pretty good too. I don’t like how we had the background light. When it is really close to the background down low, a lot of light is reflected back, and yet the upper part of the picture when he is standing is not white. For the half face shot I needed to “erase” some of the pinkish beige that was in that part of the picture.

Sam4

Sam5

Sam6

New Light Toy

2 Million Candle PowerSo this is the new light toy. It is a 2 million candle power rechargeable flashlight. It is used for light painting. Most people think of light painting as using small colored lights to make abstract drawings or neon sign type things.

Check out Dave Black. This is the type of light painting I want to do. We will have to wait and see if I can get anything close to this, but it should be fun to try.

Anyway, when I took this picture I was hoping to get some light from the flashlight in the picture. It put out so much light it lit up the room. It was hard to turn down the exposure to just light up the light with my SB800 which I wanted to do. I guess I needed something to make dust in the air, but I didn’t want to work that hard I guess. I tried briefly to add something in photoshop, but that looked really bad.

Last Studio Lighting Class

So goes the last studio lighting class I took with Gil Digden. It was a lot of fun. Mostly I think that was because I connected with several of the others in the class, and we got along well.

Shooting Sam 

Rich is the photographer, using an alien bees ring light. I wasn’t sure I would like it when we started, but I¬† do now. The dang things are expensive, unweildy, you have to mount your camera to them, and can’t hand hold, but the light has been great for our more environmental type shots. It has worked great with the elevator.

Sam2 

Sam1 

So after touting the bees, these were taken with no flash. They are not tack sharp, I was down¬†around 1/15 sec territory with a 50mm lens.¬†I like them though, but can’t decide which one I like better.

The next thing todo is decide¬†on and actually purchase lights. It is tough, because Gil has a bias toward the big lights, and doesn’t think much of speedlights. He pretty much sold the whole class on getting Photogenics strobes. I am not sold. If I get strobes, I will get¬†Alien Bee’s lights. Lots of professionals better than I are using them.

I want to make some Big Light with Small Flashes before I move to the big guns. Joe McNally and David Hobby make some killer shots with speedlights.